Updated October 14, 2026 · ShieldCue Editorial Team

Privacy Badger vs Qwant

Privacy Badger scores 9.2 and Qwant 9.3 out of 10. Compare their differences and shared features below.
Privacy Badger

Privacy Badger

9.2/10
Qwant

Qwant

Higher score in this comparison

9.3/10

Where Privacy Badger and Qwant differ

Privacy Badger vs Qwant
ComparePrivacy BadgerPrivacy BadgerReviewSee alternativesSee alternativesQwantQwantReviewSee alternativesSee alternatives
Free plan limitsNo usage limits and no paid tiers; free for all users, funded by donationsFree and unlimited once you create a Qwant account
PlatformsChrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Opera, Brave, Firefox for Android, Edge for AndroidWeb, iOS, Android, Chrome extension, Edge extension, Firefox extension, Safari extension
Logging policyNo browsing data collected or shared; data is only sent if the user chooses to file a broken site reportBy default does not store search history or personal data; no advertising trackers or pixels
JurisdictionUSFR
Open sourceYesHas itNo
Privacy tool typeAd blocker, BrowserSearch

Same on both: Free plan (Yes).

We earn a commission when you sign up through links on this site. Partner status can affect where a brand appears in our rankings. Partners with a live offer in your country come first, then every other brand by score.

Key differences

  • Qwant scores higher overall: 9.3 vs 9.2.
  • Platforms: only Privacy Badger offers Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge.
  • Platforms: only Qwant offers Web, iOS, Android.
  • Support channels: only Qwant offers Phone.
  • Open source: only Privacy Badger.
  • Founded is lower at Qwant: 2011 vs 2014.
  • Privacy tool type: only Privacy Badger offers Ad blocker, Browser.
  • Privacy tool type: only Qwant offers Search.

Our verdict on each

Privacy Badger

Privacy Badger is a browser extension created by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It algorithmically blocks trackers, receives periodic learning updates from Badger Sett by default, can replace blocked social or media widgets with click-to-activate placeholders and sends the Global Privacy Control signal.

Read the full Privacy Badger review

Qwant

Qwant suits readers who want a private search engine with no cost attached, since a free plan is included. It is the fit for people who put no stored search history above open source code, while the typical starting price in the site's private-search field is €6.93.

Read the full Qwant review

Score breakdown

Privacy Badger vs Qwant
AreaPrivacy BadgerQwant
Cost9.19.1
Offer9.39.6Higher
Privacy9.1Higher8.8

Pick Privacy Badger if, pick Qwant if

Pick Privacy Badger if privacy and open source matter most.

Pick Qwant if offer matter most.

Positions in our rankings

Privacy Badger vs Qwant
RankingPrivacy BadgerQwant
Privacy tools74 of 28162 of 281
Private browsers and search engines15 of 5511 of 55

Every fact side by side

Privacy Badger vs Qwant
FactPrivacy BadgerQwant
Pricing modelFreeFree
Legal entityElectronic Frontier FoundationQWANT, SAS (RCS Paris B 532 867 256)
HeadquartersUnited StatesFrance
Founded20142011Lower
Support channelsEmail, Help centre, CommunityEmail, Phone, Help centre, CommunityCovers more

Pros and cons

Privacy Badger

Pros

  • Privacy Badger uses an algorithmic tracker-blocking approach.
  • It can replace blocked widgets with click-to-activate placeholders and sends a Global Privacy Control signal.

Cons

  • Periodic tracker-learning updates from Badger Sett are enabled by default.

Qwant

Pros

  • A free plan is included, and Free and unlimited once you create a Qwant account.
  • Search history and personal data are not stored by default, and no advertising trackers or pixels are run.
  • It runs on web, iOS and Android and support covers email, phone and help centre.

Cons

  • Open source: no, so the code behind the engine is not published for outside review.
  • The unlimited free tier depends on signing up: Free and unlimited once you create a Qwant account.

Who each suits

Privacy Badger

Who it suits

  • Users seeking a browser extension with tracker controls and Global Privacy Control signaling.

Qwant

Who it suits

  • Readers who want a search engine that keeps no search history or personal data by default.
  • People in the Apple ecosystem, who can pair a Qwant account with Apple Hide My Email for aliasing.
  • Anyone who wants one account across web, iOS and Android.

Who should look elsewhere

  • EasyOptOuts, for readers whose main task is opting out of data brokers rather than searching; it has no free plan.
  • Apple Hide My Email, for email aliases: its aliases are free with an Apple Account, which is a different job from private search.

Questions about each

Qwant

Is Qwant really free?+

Yes. A free plan is included and Free and unlimited once you create a Qwant account, so the search stays free once an account exists. The only model listed is free, so there is no paid tier priced against it.

What does Qwant cost, and what happens at renewal?+

Qwant's free plan covers the search, and Free and unlimited once you create a Qwant account. There is no introductory deal to time and no renewal step for a paid plan, since free is the only model listed. For scale, the typical yearly price across tools on the site is €65.76.

Does Qwant store what I search for?+

Its logging policy says search history and personal data are not stored by default, and it runs no advertising trackers or pixels. The privacy type listed is search, so this is a search engine profile rather than a VPN or ad blocker.

Is Qwant open source?+

No. Open source is listed as no, so the code behind the engine is not published for outside review. That is a limit for readers who want to audit a privacy tool, and closed engines are common here, with 52.5% of the private-browser-search tools also closed.